More money alone won't solve education crisis
Monday, March 8, 2010, 12:11 PM
In a recent column, Mort Kondracke calls upon the need for, and hope that, needed education reform will not get lost in the political squabbling currently occupying Congress. He points out:
“...A work-force report by the Business Roundtable warned that the United States is the only major industrialized country with a younger generation that has a lower level of high school achievement than the older generation and is second to last in college completion.
And, as Obama pointed out Monday, speaking to the America’s Promise Alliance, a third of U.S. children fail to graduate from high school — including half of all minority children, condemning most of them to lives of poverty and creating a huge cost to society.....”
So yes, the problem is easily identified. But the solution? Not so much.
Kondracke continues:
“...Obama wants to replace the NCLB’s goal of having all students “proficient” in reading and math by 2014 with that of having them “college and career ready” by 2020 and having their performance benchmarked against a common international standard agreed to by all states....”
What stands out is the changing from “proficient” in reading and math to “college- career ready”. The current bureaucracy can't even get more than a third of students to graduate under the current grade inflated, anything goes, you're all so special system.
It is naive at best to think that a system that has been failing students for over forty years is all of a sudden going to embrace the “reforms” necessary to get students “college-career” ready by the end of this decade.
While President Obama's goals are to be applauded, the same age old question remains.
Why is it that the only solution ever thought of by government and the unions is more money, more money, more money?
The U.S. Census Bureau reports that for 2006-2007 the United States spent on average over $9600 per student on public elementary/secondary education. (In 1970, the amount was right at $4,000.) Common sense would lead one to believe that such a dramatic increase in funding would see at least some sort of improvement.
Yet instead the system is WORSE today than it was four decades ago!
Somebody needs to remind these idiots that it wasn't laptops and the internet that got Apollo 11 to the moon, it was basic mathematics and American ingenuity.
No matter the latest and greatest new teaching “philosophy”, 2 + 2 is still 4, and reading and writing can still be done with a #2 pencil and a Red Chief tablet.
Multiplication tables are still best learned through old fashioned repetition and memorization that imprints them onto the mind for a lifetime of recall without need for a calculator.
And no amount of “whole word” gurgitating will ever replace the common sense and logic of phonics.
America achieved the pinnacle of her greatness with less money, less technology, and less government than could have ever been dreamed of forty years ago.
Yet all we hear from the unions and the government is more money, more technology, more this, more that, more, more, more, more.
“Trust us, just give us more and THIS TIME (wink, wink), we'll get it right, we promise.” (Pinky swear, really, we really, really will.)
Things may not have been the “best” in all schools those years past. Not all had the “latest and greatest” technology, or even year round air conditioning. Yet students managed to achieve the one thing that they're not doing today: They actually LEARNED something.
And before the “self-esteem, let's not hurt anyone's feelings” attitude took over the classroom students actually KNEW if they were learning or not. A,B,C,D and F were more than just letters in the alphabet, they were guideposts for progress.
Sure there were times the “self-esteem” was bruised, or you didn't get the grade you felt you deserved. But perhaps the most important thing learned in school back than was that life wasn't perfect and it certainly wasn't always fair. And you learned those facts while you still had a support system around you to deal with them.
Absent all the state, federal and union mandates, local school boards were actually in control of their own schools. In turn, the community and students shared in their destiny.
Yes, our educational “system” is broken, but the problem isn't with the students or the vast majority of teachers.
The problem is with the government, the politically correct parasites, and self-serving unions who have hijacked public education for use as indoctrination centers and private retirement plans.
Until the public, parents, and politicians of all parties, acknowledge that it is the entrenched educational establishment not lack of funding that is failing our students today there will not only be no meaningful “reform”, there will be never be measurable improvement.
Arrogance, hypocrisy, and humility - Washington's 2 out of 3
Friday, March 5, 2010, 04:45 AM
Steve Wynn on wealth, jobs and why we should listen
Sunday, February 28, 2010, 11:04 AM
Rush Limbaugh clip of Steve Wynn from www.therightscoop.com
President Obama and politicians in Washington are restraining job growth in America and actually hurting the very workers they claim they are trying to help with their constant bashing of wealth and the evil of being "rich".
At least that's the view of Wynn Resorts Ltd. (WYNN) Chairman and CEO Steve Wynn.
On his company's 4th QTR conference call, Wynn stated emphatically: "it is preposterous that businesses are under attack in the United States of America." and that small business owners "hustling" their businesses are: "yes, they are the enemy now. They are the rich folks."
When asked about his outlook for 2011 and beyond:
I’ve got more questions than answers. I have more pessimism than I have had before. And it’s based upon the political environment in which we are living today. And it definitely is impacting Las Vegas. The President of the United States hasn’t missed one single opportunity to swelch [ph] Las Vegas. In our particular case it’s cost us millions of dollars from companies affected by the President’s remarks that had no connection whatsoever to federal bailouts. But we get phone calls, and I am not going to mention the names of the companies, from Chairmen, who say we don’t want to appear to be profligate because Barack Obama said this or that about Las Vegas. But it’s had an effect on us
Regarding the new Washington parlor game of bashing the "rich":
Anybody that makes over$250,000 in the form of a personal income tax return is now by Washington definition ‘a rich person’ when everybody who has got a college degree knows that the personal income tax rate in the United States of America is the business tax of America. Every subchapter S, every individual proprietorship, and every partnership in the United States of America files tax returns as individuals. And when they do, and they show that they made $2 million, or $3 million or God forbid $4 million, they pay the income tax rate. They deduct their working expenses, their living expenses and then they invest in a new store, a new shop, and most of the time 25% of their “profits” are tied up in accounts receivable or inventory. But all of a sudden, all of those people who make over $250,000 are rich folks to be fleeced. And if that’s job formation stimulation in America, (inaudible) providence.
And Wynn was in no mood to apologize for his sentiments:
And if I sound angry about it, and disgusted, I am disgusted and angry at the apparent ignorance of the administration and the Congress to recognize the fact that the individual tax rate in the United States of America is in fact the business tax of America. And if you keep banging on that, you will destroy in the incentive for job formation in the United States of America. And that’s simple truth. Simple truth. And whether politicians like it or don’t like it, it means nothing to me.
What the future holds:
Well, until we get over this America is in for hard times because what’s going to happen is the people that are going to suffer from what’s going on are the working class of America. My 15 to 20,000 employees they are the ones that are in trouble. The reason they are in trouble is this demolition of the dollar. It’s going to reduce the buying power of the working class of America as sure hell as if we gave them a salary cut of 25%. And that’s another thing that doesn’t seem to be clear to the brilliant people in Washington, D.C. They are not just our customers, they are my employees. And until my employees get the drift of what’s being done to them America is in trouble.
Steve Wynn is not of Washington "elite" stock. As a young man Wynn faced the pre-mature death of his father due to heart surgery complications, was thrust into the family bingo business and immediately had to begin paying off hundreds of thousands in gaming debts incurred by his father.
Why should we care what Wynn thinks?
Because unilke the current occupant of the Oval Office, in Wynn's office he actually creates jobs and pays taxes.
Because quite frankly, Steve Wynn speaks from experience, knowledge and doesn't need a teleprompter to speak for him.
Because, unlike Barack Obama, Steve Wynn knows that every dollar the federal government "re-distributes" to where it deems that dollar is "more needed" is nothing more than sanctioned class warfare that destroys more dreams than it can ever create.
Steve Wynn is what used to be (until the Obama Administration) just another American success story among millions told and retold throughout this great nation's history.
Through hard and focused work adversity is overcome, business grows, prosperity follows and over the course of one human lifetime, thousands of others find jobs and their own wealth because of the dream and vision of another.
Growing a business and creating jobs. Hmmmmmmmm, something Obama and the vast majority in his administration have never done yet they want the rest of us to "trust" that they know what's right for the rest of us. (You know, the "rest of us", those of us out here actually creating the jobs and wealth that they so eagerly bash and so quickly tax?)
But Wynn didn't rely upon just his own observations when asked about long term strength in Vegas:
And as I said before, I think we are on hold for a while unless the government in Washington gives the world a message that America – Lee Kuan Yew, speaking of Singapore, was in the United States and went to visit the President of the United States. The day before he went to visit the President he was on television on Charlie Rose’s Show. And Charlie Rose asked this brilliant, most elder statesmen in the world, the man who founded Singapore; he asked Lee Kuan Yew, what about America and what advice would you give the President of the United States? And this age Mount Rushmore caliber man said on television, on PBS, and I am sure he repeated it in the wine house, but I wasn’t there of course, he said, unless the government and the administration can learn to control government expenditures that are wildly out of control, the value of the dollar will be decimated and destroyed to the detriment of the people, of the world and the United States and the world. That’s what he said. And until we have a signal that such discipline and common sense has regained its footing I don’t know how to answer the kinds of questions that you are asking. And I don’t think any other business man does either.
Charles Kokly of Stifel Nicolaus commented that Lee Kuan Yew, "sounds like Thomas Jefferson, if you do a little reading".
Steve Wynn, a proven and accomplished entreprenuer sees the damage Obama is doing to the economy, Lee Kuan Yew, a man who has proven his intelligence with deeds, not words, sees the financial danger Obama's deficits are putting the country in, and tens of millions of Americans the country over see through the smoke and mirrors.
Why then, cannot the "smartest, most intellectual, most nuanced" President in decades see the swath of destruction his rhetoric and policies is leaving across this great land?
One answer is he's just too arrogant to admit it, another is he knows exactly what he's doing and doesn't give a damn.
Whichever answer you pick matters not.
For the only thing that truly matters if you care about the future of this nation and her grandchildren to come is that the insanity of spending and growth of government in Washington be stopped and stopped sooner rather than later.
Health Care Summit more mole hills than apex of ideas
Saturday, February 27, 2010, 10:38 AM
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid after summit, AP/J. Scott Applewhite
If you were one of the millions of Americans hoping that Obama's health care summit Thursday would result in finally reaching the apex of ideas on health care reform, you were sorely disappointed.
If you were one of the entrenched partisans hoping for a knockout blow for your side, you were sorely disappointed.
If you were one who actually tuned in to Washington's version of watching paint dry you saw the President of the United States brought down from the towering mountain that is the office of the Presidency, to maneuvering amongst mole hills of partisan minutia.
From the outset it was clear that the President had no intention to start over with a clean slate and proceed on the issues that Republicans and Democrats CAN agree on. Though Dem after leading Dem (including Obama himself) is on video denouncing a 2005 Senate Republicans threat to use "reconciliation", there was no "denouncing" or taking it off the table in regards to health care reform.
When Senator Lamar Alexander proposed that a good starting point would be:
And my request is this -- is -- is before we go further today that the Democratic congressional leaders and you, Mr. President, renounce this idea of going back to the Congress and jamming through on a bipartisan -- I mean on a partisan vote through a little used process we call reconciliation your version of the bill.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went so far as to flat out lie to the room, the cameras and the world by responding with, “No one has talked about reconciliation,”. A whopper that would make even the most bold fish teller proud.
The truth is reconciliation HAD been talked about and talked about my many leading up to the summit. For Reid to feel comfortable enough to lie about it said it all. The President and Dems were as sincere about compromise as Iran was about giving up it's nuclear dreams.
From that moment on, Obama's highly touted "summit" was laid bare for what it was.
A photo opp intended to show him as really, really trying and it was all those big bad mean Republicans who wanted to ensure profits for insurance companies at the expense of babies, wives and grandma's.
But the Great O's handlers gravely miscalculated this time.
Rather than combative and insulting, the Republicans presented their positions and ideas respectfully and with the facts to back them up. Facts that poll after poll after poll, show the American people more in agreement with than the 2000 plus pages of carve outs and payouts the Dems have on the table.
While neither side gained ground, the summit did succeed in exposing the President.
If the goal was to show an arrogant and irritated Obama doing what he does best: blame others for any lack of "progress", cut off any valid counterpoints with inuendo and campaign rhetoric, and make sure that responsibility never rests with him, that goal was acheived many times over.
Obama and the Dems may have dominated the time ( approx 70% to 30% per Jeff Simon and Charles Reilly over at CNN) but they could not denounce the one undisputable truth left at the end of the day:
No number of summits, nor any amount of Presidential air time will change the fact that the process of "health care reform" has become so convoluted, so disgusting, that the only way to bring integrity back and get the American people behind it is to start anew.
Starting over and finding common ground is what a smart, humble, true "servant of the people" President would do.
But then again this IS Obama.
This IS the President who has shown time and time again, he has absolutely no interest in serving the American people. Unless of course you're one of those "people" who runs a public union, trial lawyers association, or has mastered the art of "bundling" campaign contributions, then by all means you shall bask in the Great O's largesse.
The Joplin Globe's op/ed page today highlights the health care debate.
First is the editorial calling for the President and Dems to start over without delay and bring about a "good bill with broad support".
Second is Mort Kondracke's column on two governors (one R, one D) who have a much better grasp of the problem than the pinheads in D.C.
Brian Duffy's "Health Care Summit" cartoon sums it up nicely and a voices letter from Phillip Wilson illustrates the anger of the left.
High speed chase ends in death: A story to remember, a lesson to learn
Friday, February 19, 2010, 11:35 AM
When it comes to high speed police chases, the story's always eerily the same, with only the victims names being changed.
The “story” was written again Tuesday night as a Joplin Police Officer observed a vehicle change lanes without using a turn signal. The driver, Boyd L Damet decided to make a run for it, the officer (name not released by JPD as of this writing) decided to give chase, and few minutes later one Marcayla Ackerson, an 18 year old teenager had her life ended prematurely in the crash that was the result of those two decisions.
As with every chapter of this story, controversy and criticism abounds on all sides. A read of the online comments to Joplin Globe stories show the usual camps squaring off:
1.Cops are nothing but overzealous, red-neck, picked on in high school, nit-wit bubbas who salivate at any chance to flip on the lights and give “hot pursuit”.
2.Cops are just doing a dangerous and thankless job and blame should be placed squarely on Damet for not pulling over when the lights came on.
Neither side will change the others minds, neither side has absolute right in their corner, and neither side accepts one indisputable fact: there is and there never will be black and white, right or wrong in these issues.
The “anti” cop comments range from those with a deep mistrust of police in general to the usual armchair quarterbacking “there must have been a better way”.
The “pro” cop comments coalesce around the simplicity of “if the idiot hadn't run, it wouldn't have happened”.
But the truth is, there is no “simple” answer and at the time it's just not possible to always know the “better” way.
To pursue or not to pursue is one of the most complex decisions ever faced by an officer of the law.
A balancing act between immediate apprehension of the suspect against the dangers imposed upon the unsuspecting and innocent public that will inevitably become party to the chase.
To expect that high speed chases are never required or that when they are they will never end in tragedy is to expect not just the improbable but the outright impossible.
What the public can, and should expect however is that there is a formal, prudent policy in place, that all officers are aware of and have been versed in said policy, and that a thorough and transparent review be completed following every chase, no matter the outcome.
We should all have compassion, sympathy, and prayers for Ms. Ackerson's family and friends. But parents and teenagers the world over need to heed the warning written between the lines of this story.
Sadly, Ms. Ackerson's tragedy did not start with an illegal lane change. The tragedy started with an 18 year old teenager hanging out with a 26 year old convicted felon.
A quote by “Littluns” author Mark Glamack sums it:
"If you surround yourself with the good and righteous, they can only raise you up. If you surround yourself with the others, they will drag you down into the doldrums of mediocrity, and they will keep you there, but only as long as you permit it."
Marcayla Ackerson's life was ended before she could mature and tell Damet she was no longer going to permit him to drag her down, but we should not let that be the end of her story.
There will always be the Damet's of the world preying upon the naivety of the young.
Not all of our young can be protected, many will resist, but we should all forever remember Marcayla's story. Not that it be remembered for remembrance sake, stead that it not be re-written with but more names changed.
Next

